Karam Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court, per Justice Bindal, deferred the detailed disposal of the appeal to a separate order passed in R.F.A. No. 346 of 1993 involving co-appellants.
The Court, per Justice Bindal, deferred the detailed disposal of the appeal to a separate order passed in R.F.A. No. 346 of 1993 involving co-appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 349 of 1993 (O&M)
Karam Singh and others
...... Appellants
Versus
The State of Punjab and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 346 of 1993, titled Mohinder Singh and another Versus The State of Punjab and another.
13.10.2010
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
sarita
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohinder Singh and another Versus The State of Punjab and anotherReferred¶12
R.F.A. No. 346 of 1993
Karam Singh and others
The State of Punjab and another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court