Disposed
Manphool Singh etc. v. Haryana State etc.
Punjab & Haryana HCRFA/3334/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 3334 of 2002 (O&M)
Manphool Singh and others
....... Appellants
Versus
Haryana State and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, for the land owners.
Mr. Ashish. Gupta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Brijeshwar Singh, Advocate, for Power Grid Corp. of India.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 3321 of 2002 Ram Nath Versus Haryana State and others the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
(RAJESH BINDAL) 13.08.2010 JUDGE sarita
Manphool Singh
Haryana State
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court