The High Court disposed of a reference filed appeal by adopting the reasons and order passed in a separate judgment of the same date regarding identical parties and matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 2112 of 1993 (O&M)
Gurdev Singh and others
....... Appellants
Versus
The State of Punjab
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the land owners.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 2111 of 1993 Gurdev Singh and others Versus The State of Punjab the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
02.08.2010 sarita
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Gurdev Singh and others
The State of Punjab
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
