Smt. Raj Kumari appealed against the award assessing land value for acquisition in Sector-13, Panipat. Relying on Nand Lal, the court allowed further enhancement of compensation to Rs. 139 per square yard.
The present appeal is disposed of in same terms as the judgment in Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana and another.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
R. F. A No. 1613 of 1996 (O&M)
Smt. Raj Kumari
State of Haryana and another
vs
..... Appellant ..... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Pankaj Dagar, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal J.
The landowner is in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 23.2.1989 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land situated in Village Patti Insar and Patti Magdum Jagdan, Tehsil and District Panipat, for development and utilisation thereof as residential, commercial, industrial and institutional area in Sector-13, Panipat. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the acquired land @ 2,00,000/- per acre for chahi/nehri, and 1,50,000/- per acre for gair mumkin kind of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference, the learned court below on the basis of its earlier award, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 81/- per square yard. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal.
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claim of the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in Review Application No. 31/CI of 2007 in R.F.A. No. 1379 of 1994– Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana and another , decided on 31.8.2007, whereby the compensation for the acquired land was further enhanced to ` 139/- per square yard.
Learned State counsel did not dispute the abovesaid factual position.
For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, the present appeal is disposed of in same terms.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
11.10.2010 vs.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compensation for the acquired land should be further enhanced?
Whether the claim of the appellant in the present appeal is covered by the judgment in Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana and anotherFollowed¶13
Review Application No. 31/CI of 2007 in R.F.A. No. 1379 of 1994 Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana and another
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Raj Kumari
State of Haryana
another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
