The judgment text references a separate detailed order (R.F.A. No.1853 of 1992) for the substantive reasons and decision. No specific issue, law, or outcome is articulated in this brief text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No.1341 of 1993 (O&M)
Date of Decision:17.09.2010
Jamna Parshad
.....Appellant
Vs.
The Land Acquisition Collector-cum-District Revenue Officer, Faridabad and others
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present:Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in R.F.A. No.1853 of 1992, titled as Khushal Versus State of
Haryana.
September 17, 2010 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE
Jamna Parshad
The Land Acquisition Collector-cum-District Revenue Officer, Faridabad
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
