Single-judge order disposing of First Appeal by striking proceeds from a co-ordinate bench's order on same date; no separate reasoning recorded. Court followed the decision in R.F.A. No. 5386 of 2001.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 121 of 2002 (O&M)
State of Haryana And Another
....... Appellants
Versus
Rajbir Singh
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Anjum Ahmed, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a
separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 5386 of 2001 – State of Haryana And Another Versus Mukandi Lal And Others the present appeal is disposed of in same terms.
18.03.2010 (RAJESH BINDAL) sarita JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.F.A. No. 5386 of 2001 – State of Haryana And Another Versus Mukandi Lal And OthersFollowed¶11
State of Haryana And Another
Rajbir Singh
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
