This appeal against a Single Judge's order directing consideration for promotion once pending appointment challenges were finalized was dismissed, as the appellants could enforce the existing direction in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
L.P.A. No.1460 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 6.1.2010
Virender Redhu & others.
-----Appellants
Vs.
The State of Haryana & others.
-----Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present:Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the appellants.
ORDER:
LPA No.1460 of 2009
2
LPA No.1460 of 2009
3
impugned order.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
January 06, 2010 ( ALOK SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Single Judge's order disposing of a writ petition regarding promotion consideration warrants interference since the direction for consideration was conditional upon the finalizatio
Whether the ground that pending proceedings regarding appointments have since been finalized justifies setting aside the original order dismissing the petition but directing consideration once proceed
Virender Redhu & others
The State of Haryana & others
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
ALOK SINGH
ASHWANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
