The single-paragraph order dismisses an appeal filed by a driver and owner involving a disputed amount of Rs. 15,000, stating the court would not interfere due to the meagerness of the sum.
The appeal was dismissed with no interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
F.A.O. No. 62 of 1993 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.3.2010
Gurdev Singh @ Gurdev Chand and another
... .Appellants
Versus
Neelam Rani and others
... Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the appellants.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
A perusal of the paper book shows that the amount in dispute in
the appeal filed by the driver and owner is merely Rs. 15,000/-.
Considering the meagerness of the amount, this Court would not
like to interfere.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
19.3.2010
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
Gurdev Singh @ Gurdev Chand
Neelam Rani
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
