Petitioner failed to appear in writ petition C.W.P. No. 9893 of 1989 despite multiple notices. The Court dismissed the proceeding for non-prosecution on 15.10.2010. The judgment contains no substantive legal discussion or ratio decidendi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P.No. 9893 of 1989 Date of Decision:- 15.10.2010
The British India Corporation Ltd.
Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others.
Respondents
CORAM :HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI.
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Ajaib Singh, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sumer Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2 and 3.
RITU BAHRI,J
On 08.10.2010, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned for today. Counsel for the petitioner was ordered to be informed. As per office report, counsel for the petitioner has been duly informed. Inspite of that, even on second call none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RITU BAHRI)
JUDGE
15.10.2010
Anoop
The British India Corporation Ltd.
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
