A single judge bench dismissed the present writ petition by relying on the even-date judgment delivered in a connected petition titled 'Suman Lata & others vs. State of Punjab & others'. No substantive reasoning or other facts were recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.7240 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 15, 2010 Baljinder Kaur & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
The petition has been dismissed vide judgment of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No.5438 of 2008 titled ‘ Suman Lata & others vs. State of Punjab & others ’.
(AJAI LAMBA) November 15, 2010 JUDGE avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition should be decided independently or in accordance with the judgment in Civil Writ Petition No.5438 of 2008 titled 'Suman Lata & others vs. State of Punjab & others'.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suman Lata & others vs. State of Punjab & othersFollowed¶6
Civil Writ Petition No.5438 of 2008
Baljinder Kaur & others
State of Punjab & others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
