Writ petition challenging public road encroachment by a petitioner. Respondent municipal corporation removed the alleged obstruction after notice. Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition as disputed facts required evidence-based adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No.18745 of 2009 Date of decision: 1.9.2010
Santokh Singh Dhillon.
-----Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab and others.
-----Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Sudhir Paruthi, Advocate for respondent No.2
Mr. Surinder Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.3
Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for respondent No.4. ---
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
CWP No.18745 of 2009
2
upon 36 feet wide main road abutting the north side of his plot No.18, by constructing a gate across the public road. The petitioner pointed out the encroachment by way of representation, Annexure P-5, to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar, but no decision was taken by the Municipal Corporation.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
September 01, 2010 ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) ashwani JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santokh Singh Dhillon
State of Punjab
Municipal Corporation Jalandhar
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Ajay Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
