The Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as counsel for the petitioner failed to provide instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 1854 of 1988 Date of Decision : July 02, 2010.
Brijender Singh
...... Petitioner
Versus
The Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana, SCO No. 803, Mani Majra, U.T., Chandigarh, and others.
...... Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH.
Present:Mr. R.S. Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Addl. A.G. Haryana, for respondents.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL).
Counsel for the petitioner states that despite communications sent
to the petitioner, he has not received any response and, therefore, does not have any instructions to pursue the matter.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
(AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE
July 02 , 2010. sjks.
Brijender Singh
The Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
