Tara Chand v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous after the State granted the necessary relief requested by the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous after the State granted the necessary relief requested by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18164 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 19 , 2010
Tara Chand
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Divay Sarup, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
writ petition is rendered infructuous as the necessary relief has been granted by the State.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
August 19, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
Tara Chand
The State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
Monika
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court