Single judge order allowing a miscellaneous application to withdraw a writ petition which was consequently disposed of as infructuous.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; main petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Miscellaneous No.10640 of 2010 & Civil Writ Petition No.16278 of 2007
Date of Decision: August 16, 2010
Naresh Kumar
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
C.M. No.10640 of 2010
Application has been filed to
permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition.
Learned counsel contends that the
main petition has been rendered infructuous and the same be disposed of as such.
Application is allowed.
Let the main petition be taken up
for disposal, today itself.
CWP No.16278 of 2007 [2]
C.W.P. No.16278 of 2007
In view of the contents of Civil Miscellaneous No.10640 of 2010 and on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(AJAI LAMBA) August 16, 2010 JUDGE avin
Naresh Kumar
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
