The petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because he had been subsequently terminated, which he had separately challenged elsewhere.
Petition dismissed as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.13503 of 2009
Munish Kumar
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
...Respondents
Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Mr.Mamli says that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as subsequently the petitioner has been terminated, which he has separately challenged.
Dismissed as infructuous.
July 22, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
Munish Kumar
State of Haryana
RANJIT SINGH
RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
