Infructuous order wherein the petitioner's counsel filed a statement that the matter was no longer relevant, leading the court to dispose of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12077 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 10, 2010
Tejpal Singh & others
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Hari Singh Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 10, 2010 JUDGE avin
Tejpal Singh & others
State of Punjab & others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
