Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition challenging a university's decision on joint representation. The court granted liberty to challenge the decision later if aggrieved.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the university's decision if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.W.P. No.10625 of 2005
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.10625 of 2005 Date of Decision.23.04.2010
Sushil Kumar and others
........Petitioners
Versus
Guru Jambheshwar University Hisar through its Registrar and others
...Respondents
Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Ms. Renu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Dheeraj Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.1.
None for respondent Nos.2 to 6.
Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Suresh Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.7 to 14 and 16 to 18.
Mr. Saroj Malekor, Advocate for Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate for respondent No.15.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
C.W.P. No.10625 of 2005 -2-
same if they are aggrieved by the decision that has now been taken.
withdrawn.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
April 23, 2010 Pankaj*
Sushil Kumar
Guru Jambheshwar University Hisar
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
