The High Court dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple calls and was deemed no longer interested in pursuing the matter.
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition No.473 of 2010 Date of Decision 25.03.2010
Sittu
...... Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
...... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.C.S.Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents-State.
A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that he is no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(A.N.Jindal)
Judge
02.2010
mamta-II
Sittu
State of Punjab
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
