In a habeas corpus petition, the High Court dismissed the matter as infructuous due to the petitioner's absence despite reminders to appear, absenting any substantive hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition No.215 of 2010 Date of Decision 22.03.2010
Rajiv Kumar
...... Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
...... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.C.S.Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):
The petitioner has preferred this petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, for appointment of Warrant Officer, for getting released the alleged detenue namely Rakesh Kumar, as mentioned in head note of the petition, from the illegal custody of respondents No.2 &3.
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has levelled false allegations against the respondents-police officials.
In view of aforesaid, the present petition, having become infructuous, is dismissed.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
22.03.2010 mamta-II
Rajiv Kumar
State of Punjab
A.N.JINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
