Brief order referring the parties to see a connected criminal revision decided on the same date. No substantive legal reasoning or decision details provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Revision No.250 of 2001 Decided on 18.08.2010
M/s Rama Rice Mill and others
...... Petitioners
VERSUS
M/s Ram Dia Mal Shiv Dhan Mal, 102, New Anaz Mandi, Samalkha and another.
...... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: Mr.N.K.Sanghi, Advocate, with Mr.Aditya Sanghi and Mr.Aditya Pal Singh, Advocates, for the petitioners.
Mr.S.S.Narula, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr.Shakti Singh Chauhan, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.2-State.
A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):
For orders, see Criminal Revision No.249 of 2001 (M/s Rama
Rice Mill and others versus M/s Ram Dia Mal Shiv Dhan Mal, 102, New
Anaz Mandi, Samalkha and another) of even date.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
18.08.2010 mamta-II
M/s Rama Rice Mill and others
M/s Ram Dia Mal Shiv Dhan Mal
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
