The Criminal Revision was dismissed as it had become infructuous based on a statement by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Revision No.1780 of 2001 Date of Decision 23.09.2010
Inderjit Singh Walia
...... Petitioner
VERSUS
Harbhajan Singh Chahal and another
...... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: Mr.Ajay Singla, Advocate, for Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.J.B.S.Gill, Advocate, for the respondents.
A.N.JINDAL, J:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that this petition
has become infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, this petition, having become infructuous,
is dismissed.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
23.09.2010 mamta-II
Inderjit Singh Walia
Harbhajan Singh Chahal and another
A.N. JINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
