invoice Exhibit P.W.5/1 for a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- allegedly issued by M/s. Skyways Coach Builders, Jalandhar in favour of M/s. Virk Bus Service were the forged documents submitted with the Corporation by the petitioner for obtaining a loan of Rs.1,89,000/- for purchase of a passenger bus. It is not denied by the petitioner that he applied for the loan. In fact, he admitted this fact in his statement recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. From the statement of B.S. Narang (P.W.5), General Manager of the Corporation, it is established that a loan of Rs.1,89,000/- had been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner vide order Exhibit P.O. It stands proved on record that the petitioner had produced receipt Exhibit P.E for Rs.52,000/-, receipt Exhibit P.F for Rs.40,000/- and invoice Exhibit P.W.5/1 for a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- before the Corporation for obtaining the loan amount of Rs.1,89,000/-. Raj Kumar (P.W.4), Junior Engineer of the Corporation, had received photo-stat copies of the receipts Exhibits P.E and P.F from the petitioner and had produced the same in Court at the time of his deposition in Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the originals of Exhibits P.E and P.F did not see light of the day and it casts a doubt upon the veracity of the prosecution version against the petitioner. After giving a careful thought to this argument raised by the counsel for the petitioner, I do not see any merit therein. There is no mention in the statement of Raj Kumar (P.W.4) that the petitioner had produced before him the originals of Exhibits P.E and P.F. When there is no mention of
