The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the court allowing liberty to the appellant to file an appropriate appeal before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 928-MA of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.10.2010
Chetan Dass
...Appellant
versus
Raj Kumar Mehta
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Dipinder Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the appeal to enable the appellant to file appropriate appeal before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay.
application for condonation of delay sympathetically.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
October 12, 2010 naresh.k
Chetan Dass
Raj Kumar Mehta
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
