Petitioner in a criminal miscellaneous matter sought to discontinue the petition due to ongoing investigation and likelihood of compromise; the court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 4334 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: May 10, 2010
Gurpal Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3.
GURDEV SINGH, J.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the contentions made in the FIR are being investigated into and that there is likelihood of the compromise between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed with the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn.
Allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 10, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE
Gurpal Kaur
State of Punjab
GURDEV SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
