Petition withdrawn by the learned counsel with liberty to file a fresh petition after annexing the missing police report and parole rejection order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-35967 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : 06.01.2010
Arun Kumar alias Vicky
... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Ms. B.P.K. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. (Oral )
After arguing for some time, keeping in view the fact that the order of rejecting the prayer of parole to the petitioner as well as the police report have not been annexed with the petition, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one after annexing those documents.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE January 06, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Arun Kumar alias Vicky
State of Punjab
Satish Kumar Mittal
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
