Petitioner sought parole relief which had already been granted. Court found petition infructuous on undisputed facts and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-31313 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 18.02.2010
Rajesh Kumar alias Romi
... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Ms. BPK Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel for the respondents states that the necessary relief with regard to the release on parole has already been granted to the petitioner. This fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner and she states that this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as
infructuous.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
February 18, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Rajesh Kumar alias Romi
State of Punjab
Sati sh Kumar Mittal
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
