Mukhtiar Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No. M 21724 of 2010 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 21724 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.09.2010
Mukhtiar Singh and another ........ Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Bhupinder Banga, Advocate for Mr. R K Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
Mr. P S Gullani, Advocate for the complainant
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
In pursuance to the order dated 01.09.2010 passed by this Court, reply by way of short affidavit of Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, IPS, Additional Director General of Police, Crime Punjab, Chandigarh has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record.
In para 2 of the aforesaid reply, it is clarified that the order dated 09.08.2010 passed by this Court was brought to the notice of DGP,
CRM No. M 21724 of 2010
Punjab vide office note dated 13.08.2010 which is attached as R1 and it was in pursuance of the approval of DGP/Punjab, SSP, Ferozepur was directed to file reply on behalf of all concerned after getting the same approved from the office. It is further stated that the reports qua registration of cases were received from SSP, SAS Nagar and SSP, Fatehgarh Sahib and consolidated affidavit of SSP, Ferozepur on behalf of DGP, Punjab was received and the same was approved by DGP, Punjab on 30.08.2010.
In view of above, no further order is called for.
Disposed of accordingly.
September 22, 2010 mohan
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
Mukhtiar Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court