In an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC, the single judge held that since the petitioner had joined the investigation, the earlier interim order was made absolute.
Order dated 28.06.2010 granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 17498 of 2010 Date of decision: 20.09.2010
Darshan Singh
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. K K Goel, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 57 dated 23.05.2010 under Sections 379 IPC and Section 4(1) of Mines Act, 1952, registered at Police Station Derabassi, District SAS Nagar.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Nand Lal, states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation.
In view of the above, the order dated 28.06.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
20.09.2010 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to make the anticipatory bail order absolute given that the petitioner has joined the investigation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Darshan Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
