Shinder Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court confirmed the interim order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C., noting they joined investigation and no witnesses dissuasion or absconding risk existed, without commenting on case merits.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 11.6.2010 granting interim bail confirmed subject to Section 438(2) conditions.
What the court decided
Criminal Misc.No. M- 17285 of 2010
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No. M- 17285 of 2010 Date of decision:- 9.7.2010
Shinder Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Mr. P.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl.A.G. Punjab
RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to confirm and dispose of the petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shinder Singh and another
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Ram Chand Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/17285/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court