The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner, who admitted factual deficiencies. No substantive adjudication was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.16710 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.7.2010
Sonam Vij alias Sonam & another
...Petitioners
Versus
Senior Superintendent of Police Ambala and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. HPS Bhinder, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that
he does not press this petition as certain factual aspects have been concealed from him.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
1.7.2010 'rajpal'
SONAM VIJ
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AMBALA
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
