Jakir Hussain v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court confirmed an interim bail order previously passed for the petitioner in an investigation under the Essential Commodities Act. The Court noted the petitioner had surrendered and faced no allegations of absconding or witness tampering.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 28.5.2010 granting interim bail to the petitioner is confirmed subject to conditions imposed by the trial Court.
What the court decided
Criminal Misc.No. M-16408 of 2010
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No. M-16408 of 2010 Date of decision:- 05.7.2010
Jakir Hussain
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Anand, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to confirm the order granting interim bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jakir Hussain
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
RAM CHAND GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/16408/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court