Single judge allowed bail to petitioner Sushil Kumar, directing Sessions Judge Kurukshetra to trace the case and dispose within six months if pending.
Order to trace case and dispose within six months if pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No.M-13050 of 2010 [1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-13050 of 2010
Date of Decision: November 22, 2010
Sushil Kumar
…..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Ms. Gursreet Kaur, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
This petition was taken up on judicial side pursuant to the orders of the Hon’ble Chief Justice. The applicant Sushil Kumar had submitted to the Administrative Judge that he had been in jail for the last 13 months under Section 394 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and no witness had appeared and that he had not been granted the concession of bail.
Crl. Misc. No.M-13050 of 2010
[2]
This petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra to trace the case of the petitioner and in case it is still pending to instruct the concerned Presiding Officer to dispose of the matter within a period of six months, in case it has not been decided as yet.
November 22, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail after being in jail for 13 months without trial due to lack of witnesses.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sushil Kumar
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
