The High Court of Punjab and Haryana made the order for anticipatory bail included in an earlier order (dated 27.04.2010) absolute after the State counsel stated that the petitioners had joined the investigation.
The order dated 27.04.2010 passed by this Court granting anticipatory bail is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 11980 of 2010 Date of decision: 20.07.2010
Satnam Sisngh alias Satta and another ........ Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. K S Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 12 dated 24.01.2010 under Sections 324, 323, 326, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at police Station Sri Hargobindpur.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI-Gorakh Nath, states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation.
In view of the above, the order dated 27.04.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
20.07.2010 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to make the order for anticipatory bail absolute in view of the petitioners joining the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satnam Sisngh alias Satta
another
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
