Dismissed

Harpal Singh etc. v. State of Punjab etc.

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2010CRM-M/11600/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 Cr.PC sought directions to prevent police interference with petitioner's liberty regarding an accused relative. Respondents revealed inter-State investigation details of FIR No.28/2010. Court found no further orders necessary as non-bailable warrants were already in force.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; no further orders required.

Harpal Singh etc. Vs State of Punjab etc. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2010)

¶1

Crl. Misc.No.M 11600 of 2010

¶2

#1#

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH .

¶4

Crl. Misc.No.M 11600 of 2010

¶5

Date of Decision:-20.12.2010

¶6

Harpal Singh etc .

¶7

...... Petitioners .

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Punjab etc.

¶10

...... Respondents .

¶11

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH .

¶12

Present:Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advocate for Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab.

¶14

¶15

JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL)

¶16

Prayer is under Section 482 Cr.PC for issuance of directions to respondents no.2 & 3 to refrain from interfering into the liberty and right to life of the petitioners on account of the conduct of son of petitioner no.1 namely Jagmeet Singh @ Ghula as to ensure that the petitioner is not harassed by respondent no.3, Incharge, CIA Staff, Kharar at the behest of the private respondents no.4 & 5.

¶17

Upon notice separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3 as well as respondent no.4.

¶18

In reply filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3 it has stated that police of Madhya Pradesh visited PS Haibowal, Ludhiana on 02.02.2010 and 31.03.2010 in connection with search of Jagmeet Singh, who is an accused in case FIR No.28/2010 under Sections 302, 365, 201

¶19

Crl. Misc.No.M 11600 of 2010 #2#

¶20

and 34 of IPC Police Station Shivni Malwa, District Hoshangabad(MP) after making entries in the Daily Diary register vide number 22 dated 2.2.2010 and DDR No.14 dated 31.03.2010. It is further submitted that the District Police, Ludhiana has no concern with the investigation of the aforesaid case of Hoshangabad(MP).

¶21

In reply filed on behalf of respondent no.4-Incharge Police Station Shivni Malwa, District Hoshangabad (MP) it is submitted that the police of Police Station Shivni Malwa, District Hoshangabad(MP) visited PS Haibowal, Ludhiana in connection with search of Jagmeet Singh who is an accused in case bearing FIR No.28/2010 under Sections 302, 365, 201 and 34 of IPC Police Station Shivni Malwa, District Hoshangabad(MP).

¶22

From the aforesaid replies filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3 as well as on behalf of respondent no.4 it is evident that Jagmeet Singh is a named accused in FIR No.28/2010 under Sections 302, 365, 201 and 34 of IPC Police Station Shivni Malwa, District Hoshangabad(MP) and non bailable warrants of his arrest have been issued by the learned Illaqa Magistrate. It has further come out that the police from Madhya Pradesh had come to arrest Jagmeet Singh and the present police of District Ludhiana was associated while visited the place of Jagmeet Singh in Ludhiana.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid situation, no further orders are required to be passed in the instant petition.

¶24

Dismissed as infructuous.

¶25

( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE

¶26

20^th December, 2010 Vinay

Harpal Singh etc. v. State of Punjab etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harpal Singh etc. v. State of Punjab etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ak Sood Vs Commissioner & Serectariat of Govt of Hry

Ravi and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Piara Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Kulwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jora Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Malkiat Kaur Vs Stat E of Punjab