The petitioner filed the petition in 2008 based on unresolved newspaper publication notices. As reported those notices had been published the petition was held to have become infructuous and was dismissed without detailed expedition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.7241 of 2008 (O&M) Decided on :19.01.2010
Charanjit Lal Sharma
... Petitioner
versus
Thakar Lal Sharma & others
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. R.D.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this
petition has been rendered infructuous.
Consequently, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( AJAY TEWARI)
January 19, 2010 ( AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE
Charanjit Lal Sharma
Thakar Lal Sharma
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
