Justice Mahesh Grover disposed of a civil revision petition. The court held that the impugned order did not suffer from any infirmity, noting the trial court had already requested account books. The petition was dismissed.
The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.702 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of decision : 2.2.2010
Rajinder Kumar Jain
....Petitioner
Versus
Varinder Kumar and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
C.M.No.2479-CII of 2010
Allowed as prayed for.
C.R.No.702 of 2010
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity. During the course of trial the learned trial court has asked the petitioner to produce the account books of the firm as the controversy hinges on the accounts.
No ground to interfere.
Dismissed.
2.2.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order suffers from any infirmity warranting interference.
Rajinder Kumar Jain
Varinder Kumar and others
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
