No.237, but, those RCs were received back as unclaimed. Order dated 1.3.2006 of the learned predecessor of this Court further reveals that it has been specifically mentioend by the learned MACT that in his opinion, respondent No.1 & 2 (applicant in the present case) are evading the service and that they cannot be served through ordinary process. Therefore, they were ordered to be summoned through Munadi. Thereafter the Munadi was effected at village address of applicant. Despite the fact that Munadi was dully effected, the applicant did not come present in the court and learned MACT proceeded the applicant ex-parte. The version of the applicant that he never resided in the village cannot be believed, as, the witness Dharam Singh examined by the applicant, who is none-else but the real brother of applicant has admitted in his crossexamination that it is correct that he along with his brother Surinder Singh are residing together in one house since 1987-88. His brother Surinder Singh has remained Sarpanch of the village till 2003 and thereafter, his wife, contested as Sarpanch in the village. They used to cultivate the land in the village. He used to go village occasionally. He has further admitted is as correct that wife of Surinder Singh applicant remained Sarpanch of the village for five years and she used to visit her village
