Gurlal Singh v. Hardyal Gir & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 5898 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.09.2010
Gurlal Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
Hardyal Gir and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA
Present:- Mr. A.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
VINOD K.SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
Present revision petition has been filed against the dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for the appointment of Local Commissioner.
In view of the law laid down by this Court in Pritam Singh Vs. Sunder Lal, 1990(2) PLR 191, Niranjan Singh Vs. Satwinder Singh, 2005(2) PLR 689, Hari Om Vs. Manish Kumar 2005(2) PLR 690 and Balbir Kaur and others Vs. Pushpa Widge and others, 2006(2) RCR (Civil) 318 , the impugned order is not revisable.
Dismissed.
(Vinod K. Sharma) Judge
September 14, 2010 R.S.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pritam Singh Vs. Sunder Lal, 1990(2) PLR 191Referred¶12
Pritam Singh Vs. Sunder Lal, 1990(2) PLR 191
Niranjan Singh Vs. Satwinder Singh, 2005(2) PLR 689Referred¶12
Niranjan Singh Vs. Satwinder Singh, 2005(2) PLR 689
Hari Om Vs. Manish Kumar 2005(2) PLR 690Referred¶12
Hari Om Vs. Manish Kumar 2005(2) PLR 690
Balbir Kaur and others Vs. Pushpa Widge and others, 2006(2) RCR (Civil) 318Referred¶12
Balbir Kaur and others Vs. Pushpa Widge and others, 2006(2) RCR (Civil) 318
Gurlal Singh
Hardyal Gir and others
Vinod K Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court