A perusal of the plaint(Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioners would show that the petitioners have taken a specific stand that they as well as respondent are co-sharers in the suit land and they are in possession to the extent of their share and the respondent is trying to dispossess them from the suit land, forcibly and illegally. Further perusal of the application seeking amendment(Annexure P-4) would show that by way of proposed amendment the petitioners want to introduce wholly a new plea to the effect that the suit land stood partitioned at the time of consolidation of the land and they were in possession of the suit land on the basis of the aforesaid partition and respondent has nothing to do with the suit land. The plea taken in the amendment application cannot in any way be termed as clarificatory in nature, sought for further elaboration of the earlier pleadings. Moreover, it is the petitioners' own case that the respondent has been shown as co-sharer in the column of ownership in the revenue record. Moreover, in the present suit, the petitioners are seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering in their possession. The only issue which arises is whether the petitioners are in possession of the suit land or not. Amendment of the plaint to detail
