Rajinder Kaur v. Harpal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or put in appearance before the Court.
Criminal appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or put in appearance before the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.5437 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 16, 2010
Rajinder Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
Harpal Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: None for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL).
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
February 16, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) D.B. JUDGE
Rajinder Kaur
Harpal Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court