Petitioner withdrew the petition after stating that the parties had compromised the matter; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R No. 4106 OF 2009 (O&M)
Dharam Pal vs Smt. Shakuntla and others
Present : Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
Counsel for the petitioner states that the parties have compromised the matter and, therefore, he does not wish to pursue this petition any further.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( AJAY TEWARI )
January 22, 2010. JUDGE `kk'
Dharam Pal
Smt. Shakuntla
AJAY TEWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
