Jagbir Singh v. Sanjay Bhatia
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed impleading the legal representative of the deceased petitioner. It dismissed an application seeking pre-ponement of the revision as time-barred. The main revision petition was dismissed because the tenant failed to vacate within the six-month period and lacked merit.
What did the court decide?
Application for impleading legal representative allowed; application for condonation/dismissal in related matter dismissed; revision petition dismissed.
What the court decided
Civil Revision No.3815 of 2010 (O&M)
1
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.
Civil Revision No. 3815 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 23.8.2010
Jagbir Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
Sanjay Bhatia
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.
Present: Mr.D.S.Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner.
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether legal representatives of a deceased petitioner should be impleaded in Civil Revision No. 3815 of 2010.
Whether condonation of delay should be granted to an appeal filed by the tenant given his stated reasons.
Whether the voluntary statement of the tenant recorded by the Rent Controller is vitiated by alleged wrong advice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagbir Singh
- respondent
Sanjay Bhatia
- other
Sudesh Goyal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/3815/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court