COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Prayer to withdraw as counsel allowed; application for withdrawal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.3013 of 2008 Date of Decision: 05.08.2010
M/s Saraf Projects Pvt. Ltd.
.……Petitioner
Versus
M/s SPS Developers Private Ltd. and others ……Respondents
Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
Present: Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 ex parte.
L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL)
Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate representing petitioner states that the petitioner has taken away the brief from him and he wants to withdraw as counsel for the petitioner from the case. Prayer is allowed.
None else has appeared for the petitioner. This is last opportunity for arguments. Earlier many adjournments have been sought for arguments. Interim order dated 23.05.2008 staying further proceedings before the trial Court is operative for more than two years.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
05.08.2010 A. Kaundal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of counsel be allowed.
M/s Saraf Projects Pvt. Ltd.
M/s SPS Developers Private Ltd.
L. N. MITTAL
A. Kaundal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
