Revision petition by tenant was dismissed because the petition was not contested on merit and the earlier time grant had expired, leaving nothing to decide.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR No. 1822 of 2009
- 1-
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 1822 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.08.2010
Sewa Singh
.......... Petitioner
Versus
Mohinder Singh
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA
Present : Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the respondent.
VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
This revision petition by the tenant is directed against the orders passed by the learned Rent Controller as well as the learned Appellate Authority, ordering the eviction of the petitioner from the premises in dispute.
The eviction was sought on the ground of personal
necessity.
When this matter came up for hearing on 1.4.2009, the petition was not contested on merit, and only request made was, that the tenant be granted six months time to vacate the premises. It was in view of the request of the petitioner, that this Court issued notice of motion qua the request only.
The order passed by this Court on 1.4.2009, reads as
CR No. 1822 of 2009
- 2-
under :-
“The only request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is for the grant of six months time to the tenant to vacate the plot.
Notice of motion qua that request only 16.04.2009.
Dasti only.”
The reading of the order would show, that the petitioner
did not contest the petition on merit, and had only prayed for six month's time to vacate the plot, which already stands expired, therefore, nothing left here to be decided in this revision by this Court.
Dismissed.
20.08.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE
Sewa Singh
Mohinder Singh
Vinod K. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
