Dismissed
Meena Devi v. Suresh Kumar
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/176/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.176 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.12.2010
Meena Devi
....Petitioner
Versus
Suresh Kumar and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present: - Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Parmar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.R. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that matter has been amicably settled and suit pending before the trial Court has already been withdrawn, hence present petition has rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, believing the statement of the learned counsel for respondent No.1, states that present petition be dismissed as not pressed.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(Alok Singh) Judge
December 01, 2010 R.S.
Meena Devi
Suresh Kumar
Alk Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court