This single-line order in a contempt petition dismissed the matter as infructuous upon the judge's oral finding that the petitioner had already been appointed to the post of English Mistress via an appointment letter.
The contempt petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 1382 of 2010 Date of decision:- 13.10.2010
Sudesh Rani
......petitioner
vs.
Sukhwinder Singh
......respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab
HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL)
Mr. Sahu states that the appointment letter has been issued to
the petitioner appointing her to the post of English Mistress.
In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
13.10.2010 preeti
Sudesh Rani
Sukhwinder Singh
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
