The High Court dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellants without elaboration.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
R.S.A. No.2756 of 1983
Date of decision: March 20, 2009
Pohlu and another
... Appellants
vs.
Harphool and another
... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. B.S. Giri, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Nisha Goyal, Advocate for the respondents.
A.N. Jindal, J
Learned counsel for the appellants states that he does not want to pursue this second appeal and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
March 20, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Pohlu
Harphool
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
