appellants had been recorded as co sharers in the land. They had purchased land from Harnam Kaur as well. In such circumstances, the defendant-respondent could not acquire title by adverse possession. It is not disputed, that, the appellants had been given one house in the life time of Bishan Singh and the other house was retained by Bishan Singh. The question of partition of the said house, as such could not be arise and the suit could not be held to be bad for partial partition. The finding of the lower court on issues No.2, 4 for the reasons discussed above, is liable to be set aside. Consequently, I set aside the findings of the lower court on issues No.2 and 4. As a result of my findings above, I accept the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the lower court and pass a preliminary decree for possession by partition of the suit property comprising Khewat No.60, Khatuni No.125, Khasra No.344 situated at village Katran, Tehsil Samrala in favour of the appellants and against the respondent.”