Brief order in RFA No. 3762 of 2003 where the single judge dismissed the appeal, deferring detailed reasons to a concurrent order in a related suit filed in the sessions court.
Appeal dismissed; reasons recorded in concurrent order in RFA No. 317 of 2004.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
R. F. A. No. 3762 of 2003 (O&M)
Chiman Lal and another ..... Appellants vs State of Punjab and another .... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. N. S. Dandiwal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. H. S. Riar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board.
Rajesh Bindal J.
For orders see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in RFA No. 317 of 2004 – Smt. Shanti Devi vs The Collector and others .
17.2.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Shanti Devi vs The Collector and othersReferred¶9
RFA No. 317 of 2004 – Smt. Shanti Devi vs The Collector and others
Chiman Lal
another
State of Punjab
another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
