Sant Ram v. Union Territory of Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2345 of 2000
Date of decision : 18.5.2009
Sant Ram and another
… Appellants
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh through its Land Acquisition Collector, Estate Office, Sector 17, Chandigarh.
…Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.R.K.Dhiman, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondent.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
For orders, see RFA No.1095 of 2000 of even date.
[ Rakesh Kumar Jain ] Judge
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sant Ram and another
- respondent
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Coram
Rakesh Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/2345/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court